The Exercises Coaches Are Programming Less (And What Replaced Them)

The exercises coaches are programming less are not banned, and most of them are not dangerous in the right hands. They simply lost the argument. Two things happened at once: the science of joints got sharper, and the way people train fragmented. Both pulled the average program away from a set of movements that were once near-universal furniture.

Start with the method, because it decides how to read everything that follows. This is a current snapshot of what gets programmed, not a frame-by-frame track of a decline. We read FitFocus programming patterns from 2023 to 2026 against well-documented shifts in the training field, then reported where these movements sit now: low, and thinly programmed. We are not claiming our data timed their fall.

So this is not a do-not-program list, and it is not a safety ruling on any movement. It is a map of where the field moved, and why.

What exercises are coaches programming less?

Five once-standard movements now sit at the thin end of programming: sit-ups and crunches, upright rows, behind-the-neck presses and pulldowns, good mornings, and unstable-surface strength work. Each has a replacement that trains the same muscle or quality with less joint exposure, so coaches swap the tool rather than abandon the goal.

What faded, and what replaced it

Five swaps account for most of the shift. In each one, the old movement did not become useless. A better tool for the same job took over.

Fading	Now programmed instead	What drove the swap
Sit-ups and crunches	Planks, dead bugs, hollow holds, carries, anti-rotation work	Core training moved from spinal flexion to anti-movement after the work of McGill and Sahrmann linked repeated loaded flexion to spinal stress. The core's real job is bracing, not crunching.
Upright rows	Lateral raises, face pulls, high pulls	The upright row pins the shoulder in internal rotation under load, a position the impingement literature treats as a risk. The replacements build the same delts and traps without the pinch.
Behind-the-neck presses and pulldowns	Pressing and pulling to the front	Taking the bar behind the neck forces the shoulder into an extreme, vulnerable position. Front work hits the same muscles with far less exposure, so behind-the-neck barely appears now.
Good mornings	Romanian deadlifts, back extensions, hip thrusts	Same posterior-chain target, less shear on the lower back, and easier to progress safely for a general client.
Unstable-surface strength work	Stable loading, with balance trained separately	Pressing or squatting on a wobble board or ball reduces the force a muscle can produce, so it builds less strength and size. Coaches load on stable ground.

A few others sit in the same slow fade. Heavy dumbbell flyes and the pec deck have given way to cable flyes as the default chest staple. Old bodybuilding oddities such as 21s and behind-the-back work have been replaced by straightforward loading that is simply easier to progress.

Notice what the swaps have in common. None of them removed a training quality. Pressing, hinging, core work and chest development are all still programmed, and heavily. What changed is the tool chosen to deliver them.

The first force: sharper mechanics

The first driver is a better read on joint mechanics. Shoulder and spine research flagged internal rotation under load and repeated loaded flexion as avoidable exposures, and the rise of the rehab-influenced coach amplified it. Practitioners who screen before they load, and who prefer the option that keeps a client training for years, wrote programs differently.

Together those two produced one consistent pattern. A movement carrying more joint exposure for the same muscle gets replaced by one carrying less. The McGill approach to core stability, now taught well beyond clinical settings, is the clearest example, and the broader shift from sit-ups to anti-movement core training followed from it. On the shoulder side, the link coaches cite between the upright row and impingement is why lateral raises and face pulls took its place.

Nothing was outlawed. The field found better tools, and then wrote them into the templates.

The second force: training fragmented

The mechanics story is only half of it. The other half is that training itself split apart. A generation ago, working out mostly meant one thing: bodybuilding-style training in a commercial gym, where the crunch, the upright row and the pec deck were near-universal furniture. That monoculture is over.

Participation now spreads across a widening set of modalities, and several are growing fast. Hyrox, the fitness-racing format, went from roughly 175,000 athletes in 2023-24 to more than 650,000 the year after, with organisers eyeing a million and the format already running in thousands of affiliated gyms. Pilates has been the most-booked workout in the world for three years running, up around two-thirds since 2024, and now pulling in the men who used to live on the gym floor. Strength training keeps mainstreaming into new groups: older adults, women through menopause, people on weight-loss medication. Run clubs, boutique studios and community events keep pulling training out of the commercial gym entirely.

Here is why that matters for a fading exercise. A movement can look like it is disappearing simply because a growing share of people now train in places that were never going to program it. Hyrox trains sled pushes, carries, wall balls and running. Pilates trains controlled core and mobility. A run club trains running. None of them has a reason to program a weighted sit-up or a barbell upright row, so as they grow, the average drifts further from the old staples without any single coach dropping a thing. These are industry-wide participation figures, not ours. Boutique formats barely register on a premium coaching platform.

And the two forces point the same way, which is the part worth noticing. Much of the modality boom independently favours the movements better mechanics had already pushed coaches toward. Pilates and functional training are built on controlled core, anti-rotation and mobility, the same anti-movement work that replaced the crunch. Hyrox and functional fitness live on carries, hinges and sleds, not on the isolation-and-risk staples of the old split. The science said brace, don't crunch. The way people now choose to train said the same thing from a completely different direction.

What the shift means for a coaching business

The finding is descriptive, and it takes no position on what any individual should train. Four things follow for the person writing programs.

1. Audit the template, not the client. If upright rows, behind-the-neck work or loaded spinal flexion are still in a program out of habit rather than intent, that is a template problem. Every fading movement has an equal-benefit alternative already sitting in the library.
2. Keep the goal and change the tool. Nothing on the fading list is a training quality worth losing. The chest still gets trained, the core still gets trained, the posterior chain still gets trained.
3. Do not cargo-cult a banned list. The point was never that these movements are evil. A lifter with the shoulders for an upright row can still do one, and a good coach knows which client that is.
4. Pair it with a screening habit. The safest program is not just the right movements, it is knowing which ones a given client is ready for. That is the same prep and screening thinking behind what coaches actually do before the working sets.

All four of those are easy to say and hard to hold once more than one coach writes programs. A library that still carries the old staples, or three coaches with three different ideas about what replaced them, is how a swap quietly reverses. Keeping the library current and the choice consistent is a shared program builder job. It is also the same consolidation our report on the movements every coach programs found at the other end of the data, where a small set of patterns survives every specialty change.

Common questions about fading exercises

Are sit-ups and crunches bad for you?

Not inherently, but they train only spinal flexion, and repeated loaded flexion has been linked to spinal stress. Most coaches now program anti-movement core work instead, such as planks, dead bugs, carries and anti-rotation, because it builds the core's real job of resisting and transferring force.

Why do coaches avoid upright rows?

The upright row places the shoulder in internal rotation under load, a position strongly associated with shoulder impingement. Most coaches now reach for lateral raises, face pulls and high pulls, which build the same delts and traps without pinning the shoulder in a vulnerable position.

Are behind-the-neck presses and pulldowns safe?

They force the shoulder into an extreme, compromised position, so most coaches now press and pull to the front instead. Front presses and front lat pulldowns train the same muscles with far less risk, which is why behind-the-neck work barely shows up in modern programming.

What replaced crunches in core training?

Training the core to resist movement rather than create it. Planks and dead bugs cover anti-extension, side planks and carries cover anti-lateral flexion, and Pallof presses cover anti-rotation. Those build a stronger, more protective core than endless spinal flexion, and they transfer better to lifting and sport.

Methodology

This report draws on FitFocus programming patterns between 2023 and 2026, read against documented shifts in the training field. It reports where movements currently sit in programming, as patterns rather than counts, and does not claim to have timed their decline longitudinally. The modality-participation figures are industry-wide trend data, distinct from our platform data; boutique formats such as Hyrox and Pilates barely register on a premium coaching platform. Figures are observational and are not a coaching or clinical prescription, and no client-identifying information is included. For the mechanics we drew on the McGill approach to core stability, the move from sit-ups to anti-movement core training and the upright row and shoulder impingement. For the modality boom, Hyrox participation growth, Pilates as the most-booked workout and strength training's broadening demographics.

FitFocus gives coaches a clean, current exercise library and the tools to build better programs at scale. Book a 30-minute demo to see how it would run your roster.